In Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, the Supreme Court held that daughters are coparceners by birth, with the same rights as sons in Hindu ancestral property.

When a family decides to sell or redevelop an old ancestral home, one question decides who signs: are the daughters co-owners? Since 2020, the answer is clear.
In Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, decided on 11 August 2020, the Supreme Court held that under the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act:
In ancestral property, a daughter's share is not a favour. It is hers by birth.
This is about coparcenary (ancestral) property of a Hindu undivided family. A flat your father bought himself is self-acquired and passes under his will, or under the succession rules if there is no will. See who inherits a flat without a will.
Yes. In Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020), the Supreme Court held daughters are coparceners by birth with the same rights as sons.
No. Marriage does not take away a daughter's coparcenary rights.
This is general information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change, so check your own case with a lawyer or CA.
Own a flat in Mumbai, Thane or Navi Mumbai? Book a call and tell me what you are dealing with.
Warmly,
Yanik
Own a flat in Mumbai while living abroad?
TND Listings manages, sells and helps you buy property across Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Thane, with one point of contact.
By Invitation Only